
A dramatic scene unfolded on Thursday as Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), was ordered out of the courtroom after escalating disruptions , security personnel were instructed to escort Kanu following repeated interruptions that threatened the proceedings. According to vanguard
Eyewitnesses reported that the courtroom erupted in commotion as security officers guided Kanu out. The incident, captured on video, quickly circulated on social media, igniting debate nationwide.
The tension reportedly began when Kanu vocally challenged several procedural rulings. He repeatedly interrupted proceedings, prompting the presiding judge to warn that decorum must be maintained.
When these warnings were ignored, the court directed security agents to remove him.

A security official involved said:
“We followed the judge’s instructions. Our priority is to maintain order and ensure the hearing proceeds safely.”
Tinubu Pushes the Military Into a Territory It’s Never Entered — And It’s Not Politics
“Nigeria Is Stable Enough”: Wike Addresses PDP Faction’s Call to a Former U.S. President
PDP Expels Nyesom Wike, Ayo Fayose, Samuel Anyanwu and Several Others
“I Messed Up Badly”: VeryDarkMan Tenders Public Apology After Aircraft Fight With Mr Jollof (Video)
Legal observers described the scene as tense but controlled, noting that such measures are standard in high-profile trials.
Supporters of Kanu expressed outrage, claiming the removal was excessive. Social media erupted with debates over judicial fairness and political influence in high-profile trials.
Legal analysts defended the removal, noting that judges have the authority to maintain order, the action is consistent with standard courtroom protocol when disruptions occur.
Drama unfolded in the ongoing judgment at the Federal High Court in Abuja regarding the terrorism charges against Nnamdi Kanu. Kanu insisted on giving his final address after much back and forth. The judge asked security personnel to escort Nnamdi Kanu out of the court. pic.twitter.com/AMTm7Igv7g
— Imran Muhammad (@Imranmuhdz) November 20, 2025
Observers also highlighted that this is not the first tense moment in Kanu’s trial, which involves charges of treasonable felony and separatist-related activities.
Each session has drawn national and international attention due to Kanu’s political profile.
Experts stress that courtroom decorum is crucial for justice. A senior lawyer explained:
“Regardless of public opinion, the court must ensure that proceedings continue without interruption. This safeguards the integrity of the trial.”
The judiciary maintains that all defendants, regardless of status, are subject to the same rules, emphasizing fairness and the rule of law in politically sensitive cases.
The removal of Nnamdi Kanu highlights the high tension surrounding his trial and the balance between judicial authority, security, and defendants’ rights. Analysts note that incidents like this reveal the challenges Nigerian courts face in managing high-profile cases while maintaining decorum.
“This trial is as much about law as it is about order. The courtroom must remain a place where justice is not overshadowed by chaos,” a senior legal analyst told GlobalHints.
As proceedings continue, all eyes remain on Kanu’s trial, with supporters, critics, and legal observers closely watching how the judiciary handles subsequent hearings.